| 1 |
On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 15:20, Mikael Hallendal wrote: |
| 2 |
> It is not a different package, just a newer version of a package which |
| 3 |
> happends to be incompatible with the previous version. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> The reason they are installing in /usr/include/freetype and |
| 6 |
> /usr/include/freetype2 is because the user should be able to have them |
| 7 |
> both installed at the same time. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This should be fixed by having dependencies like |
| 10 |
> freetype >= 1.3, < 2.0 (or whatever syntax we came up with). I'm not |
| 11 |
> sure of the current status of that. |
| 12 |
The why do we have libxml AND libxml2? |
| 13 |
And this only one of the many examples. |
| 14 |
As I said, incompatible version of library usualy made a separate |
| 15 |
package. |
| 16 |
So I think freetype-2 should be made freetype2-2 |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
TIA |
Archives