| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Aaron W. Swenson <titanofold@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2014-08-22 14:07, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Aaron W. Swenson <titanofold@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > On the whole, I'm displeased with the systemd alternative for |
| 5 |
>> > controlling PostgreSQL. It's significantly hampered and doesn't allow |
| 6 |
>> > as much flexibility as the initscript. The major issue being trying to |
| 7 |
>> > nicely shut down the server instead of jumping straight to murder. |
| 8 |
>> > |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> It looks like the package installs a service file provided by |
| 11 |
>> upstream, so you might want to direct your complaint there unless it |
| 12 |
>> really is a systemd limitation. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Delayed response, I've been looking into this as I've been working on |
| 15 |
> unifying the ebuilds, but I can't find where upstream is providing the |
| 16 |
> systemd unit. The only one I have is the one we've made. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
My bad - I didn't spot it in the SRC_URI and had just assumed it came |
| 19 |
from upstream... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Rich |
Archives