| 1 |
On 01-10-2007 22:59:40 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: |
| 2 |
> I would like to propse a new versionator.eclass for consideration (attached). |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> This version, I believe, is more readable and maintainable then the one |
| 5 |
> currently in portage. It also uses a lot less code and has the bonus of being |
| 6 |
> pure sh. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
What is your rationale to say that "pure sh" is a "bonus"? Especially |
| 9 |
given the environment this is used in as ferdy already pointed out? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I personally like consistency. So if we use bash in ebuilds, then I'd |
| 12 |
like to use bash in eclasses too. I'm interested in your motivation to |
| 13 |
make this eclass "pure sh", whatever that may mean. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 18 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives