| 1 |
On Wednesday 26 December 2001 22:01, you wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:39:28PM +0200, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi again, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Drobbins, Hallski and I just discussed this on IRC and decided that we |
| 6 |
> > can do with just 2 qts installed - the latest 2.x and 3.x. They will live |
| 7 |
> > in /usr/qt-x11-$ver and a symlink /usr/qt-x11-2 (or qt-x11-3) will be |
| 8 |
> > made to the latest qt installed. All applications will build/run against |
| 9 |
> > that symlink. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> If you are talking about the same discussion I'm thinking of, then this was |
| 12 |
> not the solution. There are *no* symlinks, libraries go in /usr/lib, and |
| 13 |
> the directory is /usr/qt/<version>, not /usr/qt-x11-<version>. |
| 14 |
Yes, sorry; I'm thinking of the right discuion, only I've sent the leter |
| 15 |
before I quite finished writing it. You're absolutely right; the missing |
| 16 |
details are: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Things do install in /usr/qt-{2,3}, the contents of their lib/ dirs go in |
| 19 |
/usr/lib so that the linker can easily find them, and the /usr/qt-*/lib dirs |
| 20 |
are all symlinks to /usr/lib. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Dan Armak |
| 25 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team |
| 26 |
Matan, Israel |
Archives