Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 13:40:41
Message-Id: 20130519154027.37b6cdf4@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net
1 Private messages and public comments through bugzilla are so far
2 ignored, it seems, so let's try a venue where it's sure to cause a
3 flamewar instead. My apologies for the inconvenience.
4
5 On Sat, 18 May 2013 21:08:53 +0000
6 bugzilla-daemon@g.o wrote:
7
8 > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
9 > whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
10 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470392
11 >
12 > Bug ID: 470392
13 > Summary: Please stabilize =dev-libs/libconfig-1.4.9-r1
14
15 We agreed a little while ago that bug Summaries should start with an
16 atom, if possible, and explain the action later. Also, robotically
17 filing thousands of bugs and making them say "please" every time isn't
18 going to endear anyone to your cause. So do something like this:
19
20 "<cat/pkg-version> stabilisation request"
21
22 > URL:
23 > http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-libs/libconfig? arches=linux
24
25 Is this URL useful to include, or did you just want to abuse every
26 last feature found in pybugz? Wouldn't maintainers already know where
27 to find this kind of information? Who do you think is your audience?
28
29 > OS: Linux
30 > Status: CONFIRMED
31 > Severity: enhancement
32
33 Is a stabilisation an enhancement per se? If all stabilisations are
34 enhancements, then why isn't Severity set to Normal instead? (What is
35 an enhanced severity to begin with, Mozilla?)
36
37 > Priority: Normal
38
39 This is where you probably wanted to set something similar to
40 Enhancement above, but again you probably shouldn't. Normal
41 stabilisation bugs are normal, not less than normal.
42
43 > Is it OK to stabilize =dev-libs/libconfig-1.4.9-r1 ?
44 >
45 > If so, please CC all arches which have stable keywords
46 >
47 > for older versions of this package and add STABLEREQ keyword
48 >
49 > to the bug.
50
51 My e-mail editor is messing up the line endings here, but your messages
52 already include double newlines - on bugzilla web pages as well as in
53 the e-mail it sends, so this is your broken pybugz script again, I
54 reckon?
55
56 Also, your script does not set the STABLEREQ keyword. People are having
57 to hunt down your robo-stabilisation requests and add it themselves.
58 You should just do it yourself or turn your script off.
59
60
61 jer

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs "Paweł Hajdan
Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>