| 1 |
John Helmert III wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Searching for the repo name on GitHub finds this however: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > https://github.com/bdrewery/vchkuser |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > ..which seems to be a 2010 version of the code. I did a test, it works |
| 7 |
> > fine. Maybe just change the SRC_URI. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Can you produce a guarantee that the code there is equal to the code |
| 10 |
> which the ebuild currently refers to? Or maybe that it's equivalent to |
| 11 |
> the now-removed repository? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Git thinks so. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I unpacked vchkuser-0.4.tar.gz from a Gentoo mirror on top of a |
| 16 |
bdrewery/vchkuser checkout and: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
$ git status |
| 19 |
# On branch master |
| 20 |
nothing to commit, working directory clean |
| 21 |
$ |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
The v0.4 tag in bdrewery/vchkuser also equals the commit hash in the |
| 24 |
directory name of the .tar.gz. (This is of course weak.) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
//Peter |
Archives