| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:29:47 -0500 |
| 3 |
> Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> (As an aside, I didn't realize that Roy's e-mail was supposed to |
| 5 |
>> be a proctor directive.) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> He changed the subject and signed "on behalf of gentoo-proctors". |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> Is there a way to fix the current system, or should it be chucked |
| 10 |
>> entirely, as has been suggested? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The problem is not so much the system as a small number of the |
| 13 |
> proctors. Perhaps it should be restaffed with people who aren't so used |
| 14 |
> to wielding god-like powers on the forums, where anyone who dares say |
| 15 |
> anything that disagrees with a small clique's collective views can |
| 16 |
> be banned permanently with no accountability. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
Thanks for your wonderful insight, No one had any idea the proctors were |
| 19 |
a group with no accountability. When the council reviews everything |
| 20 |
they've done in the past month, we're just joking around. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Back to reality, go take a long walk off a short pier. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
======================================================= |
| 26 |
Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org |
| 27 |
Gentoo Council |
| 28 |
Gentoo Infrastructure |
| 29 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead |
| 30 |
GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05 |
| 31 |
======================================================= |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives