Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 23:43:44
Message-Id: 20080530234338.GA6931@seldon.metaweb.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 12:26:44AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sat, 31 May 2008 01:13:58 +0200
3 > Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote:
4 > > I know exactly which standard -ffast-math violates (IEEE/ISO floating
5 > > point spec) and how (the man page is quite complete about this),
6 > > --as-needed doesn't have any warning about this, there isn't any
7 > > standard that it violates since it's the default behavior at least
8 > > for 2 platform (one from those who wrote most of the ELF spec...).
9 > > Point the spec, and the paragraph violated.
10 >
11 > ISO/IEC 14882:1998 section 3.7.1 paragraph 2.
12
13 Might want to confirm it's in 14882:2003, since the '98 was withdrawn...
14 ~harring

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>