| 1 |
On Sunday 01 of May 2011 12:09:15 Eray Aslan wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 12:06:47PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > ... the time alone if you have to stop on each package to wait for |
| 4 |
> > echangelog to get done just doubles the amount of time you have to put |
| 5 |
> > into committing them. That's just not worth the effort. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Won't moving the tree to git will make this a moot discussion? These and |
| 8 |
> similar solutions look more and more lika a band-aid to the defecencies |
| 9 |
> of cvs. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
No, because ChangeLogs could be dropped even now (and generated for rsync |
| 12 |
using cvs2cl tool) since ebuild history is already available in CVS |
| 13 |
(sources.gentoo.org). This discussion is about what tree changes are and which |
| 14 |
aren't relevant enough for users to be redundantly documented in ChangeLog |
| 15 |
files assuming they're to be kept for now. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
regards |
| 19 |
MM |
Archives