| 1 |
Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 27 December 2005 23:12, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>This has the side affect that the library location code is not used |
| 5 |
>>until I code or take the logic from glibc from example. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>betelgeuse@pena ~/bin $ checkdeps.rb subversion |
| 8 |
>>dev-libs/apr |
| 9 |
>>dev-libs/apr-util |
| 10 |
>>dev-libs/expat |
| 11 |
>>dev-libs/openssl |
| 12 |
>>dev-util/subversion |
| 13 |
>>net-misc/neon |
| 14 |
>>sys-libs/db || app-office/openoffice-bin |
| 15 |
>>sys-libs/gdbm |
| 16 |
>>sys-libs/glibc |
| 17 |
>>sys-libs/zlib |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Unfortunately scanelf also doesn't know (nor can it know) that some libraries |
| 21 |
> like apr-util do not link against the libraries they need, but leave it for |
| 22 |
> users to link against them properly by means of the apu-config utility. As |
| 23 |
> such subversion could link against libldap. It does however not depend on |
| 24 |
> libldap, as this comes from apr-util. Perhaps this means that apr-util should |
| 25 |
> be fixed, but it certainly does not mean that subversion missed a dep. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Paul |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I just picked some package as an example of the output with |
| 31 |
openoffice-bin. My understanding here is that if you link against those |
| 32 |
libraries, it will break break binary packages because dependencies |
| 33 |
don't say to pull in required libraries. This just means that apr-util |
| 34 |
should be fixed. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Regards, |
| 37 |
Petteri |
Archives