1 |
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:06:24PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 01:18:02AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote: |
3 |
> > On 10/21/2019 19:36, Matt Turner wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:42 AM Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > >> Also, another idea is to use a cheap hash function (e.g. fletcher) and just have the mirrors do the hashing behind the scenes. Then we would have the best of both worlds. |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > It probably would have been better to make these suggestions when the |
8 |
> > > GLEP was discussed close to two years ago. |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > I'm glad that we have ideas for improvements but I worry that we're |
11 |
> > > just backseat driving at this point given that the GLEP's now |
12 |
> > > implemented. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Nothing is really etched in stone, so we could change it again if we |
15 |
> see fit. |
16 |
|
17 |
Actually, which glep are we talking about? If we are talking about glep |
18 |
75, I don't see where the council approved it [1], so it definitely |
19 |
should be discussed/approved before any implementation changes are |
20 |
made, or we should see where it was approved. |
21 |
|
22 |
William |
23 |
|
24 |
[1] https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0075.html |