| 1 |
>> which part dont you understand ? the user sets a variable and then is told |
| 2 |
>> that the package probably contains a bug ... seems pretty confusing to me |
| 3 |
>> -mike |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> rl03 already replied to that. I don't see any QA issues there, and if |
| 6 |
> someone from QA team does, then he probably has too much time to ponder over |
| 7 |
> the tree and invent issues where they don't exist. I don't see any point |
| 8 |
> "fixing" this, at least until FEATURES="mindreader" is implemented. Portage |
| 9 |
> QA notices may be equally confusing to the users, with this kind of logic, |
| 10 |
> yet they stay there - and number of people complaining about USE_EXPAND |
| 11 |
> notices is much higher than the number of people who complained about |
| 12 |
> confusing ewarn from webapps slot (exactly zero is far as I could find). |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Once again, don't invent problems, please. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Nobody is inventing problems Jakub. Just because nobody has yet |
| 17 |
complained does not mean that there is not a problem. If you can't see |
| 18 |
the QA issues, then you really need to stop commenting in this thread, |
| 19 |
because there are a lot of people who know better. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Furthermore, you are playing right into the hands of He Whom I Will Not |
| 22 |
Name, thus allowing yourself to be trolled into sounding like an idiot |
| 23 |
in public. You suffered from the same problem in the bbapm thread recently. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-Steve |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives