| 1 |
Herbie Hopkins wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm not sure why /emul was originally chosen though it's a choice I've |
| 3 |
> just gone along with whilst maintaining these packages. I've always |
| 4 |
> viewed the emul libs as a temporary measure until we had full multilib |
| 5 |
> fuctionality in portage. Afaik the only person working on this was |
| 6 |
> eradicator who has been mia for a while now so I'm unsure weather this |
| 7 |
> is ever likely to arise. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
blubb was working on this but ran out of time for it or something, he |
| 10 |
wrote a proto-GLEP that I've got lying around. I'm thinking of seeing |
| 11 |
what I can do because the current situation really annoys me, even |
| 12 |
though I don't have a multilib box. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Given that it looks like we'll be stuck with |
| 15 |
> these binary libs for some time yet then we may as well do as you |
| 16 |
> suggest and install them in a standard location to make building against |
| 17 |
> them a bit easier. I'll look into doing this when I next version bump the |
| 18 |
> packages. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Thanks, |
| 21 |
Donnie |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives