| 1 |
>>>>> On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> Only suggestion so far is "dopatch". I don't really like it because |
| 4 |
>> other do* functions are called from src_install. But if nobody |
| 5 |
>> comes up with a better name, then it will be dopatch. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> What about: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> srcpatch() |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Hm, that looks like a phase function. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> userpatch() |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> If it is for applying user patches, then I prefer userpatch(). It |
| 16 |
> also gets away from the do*() naming. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
User patches would be applied in a separate function. It would call |
| 19 |
the one we're discussing here, of course. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> I take it PATCHES variable will be a bash array, or space separated |
| 22 |
> list? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Yes, it will be an array. But I guess we will support a space |
| 25 |
separated list in addition, for consistency with DOCS. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Ulrich |
Archives