1 |
If an empty project has subprojects, I think that violates the definition |
2 |
of empty. |
3 |
|
4 |
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 8:46 AM, james <garftd@×××××××.net> wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
> On 08/06/2016 09:29 AM, NP-Hardass wrote: |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> On 08/06/2016 04:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>>> Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> Well, it seems that it's only "containing" other subprojects... but I |
13 |
>>> am unsure if we really need it. Anyway, he is now empty |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>> I think it makes sense to keep desktop environments in a logical |
19 |
>> grouping. There isn't a need for an overarching control structure right |
20 |
>> now, but if there needs to be coordination of efforts, I think keeping |
21 |
>> it in its current structure allows that to happen more easily than if we |
22 |
>> didn't have all the DEs in a project together. |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> |
25 |
> +1 |
26 |
> James |
27 |
> |
28 |
> |