1 |
On 4/3/10 12:03 PM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote: |
2 |
> On 04/03/10 10:50, Petteri Räty wrote: |
3 |
>> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just |
4 |
>> means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a |
5 |
>> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about |
6 |
>> disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21 |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract says: |
11 |
>> "We will not hide problems" |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Sounds good, can we at the same time get RESOLVED OBSOLETE (for bugs that are |
14 |
> not valid anymore due to changed situation, RESOLVED INVALID isn't applicable in |
15 |
> this case as it implies the bug is and was invalid from the begining). |
16 |
|
17 |
Wouldn't WORKSFORME apply in that case? Just renaming the resolutions |
18 |
doesn't gain us much. Reducing the number of possible resolutions does, |
19 |
I'd say. |