Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:29:54
Message-Id: 43D8F861.2040304@exceedtech.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable by Wernfried Haas
1 Wernfried Haas wrote:
2
3 >
4 >
5 >As for the stage 1 problems you described, this is exactly what i
6 >already told you in the same thread. Supporting stage 1 costs extra
7 >resources, this thread is a perfect example of it.
8 >
9 >cheers,
10 > Wernfried
11 >
12 >
13 >
14
15
16 I thought that if you chose to do a stage 1 install you were on your
17 own. That was my understanding. If that is true, he is getting support
18 for something that is not supported, right?
19
20 I'm shutting my non-dev mouth now. I got to go see my lady. ;-)
21
22 Dale
23 :-)
24
25 --
26 To err is human, I'm most certainly human.
27
28 I have four rigs:
29
30 1: Home built; Abit NF7 ver 2.0 w/ AMD 2500+ CPU, 1GB of ram and right now two 80GB hard drives. Named Smoker
31 2: Home built; Iwill KK266-R w/ AMD 1GHz CPU, 256MBs of ram and a 4GB drive. Named Swifty
32 3: Home built; Gigabyte GA-71XE4 w/ 800MHz CPU, 224MBs of ram and a 2.5GB drive. Named Pokey
33 4: Compaq Proliant 6000 Server w/ Quad 200MHz CPUs, 128MBs of ram and a 4.3GB SCSI drive. Named Putput
34
35 All run Gentoo Linux, all run folding. #1 is my desktop, 2, 3, and 4 are set up as servers.
36
37 --
38 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable MIkey <mikey@×××××××××××.com>