| 1 |
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:30:56AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +0000, Roy Marples wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate |
| 6 |
> > > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to |
| 7 |
> > > > it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a |
| 8 |
> > > > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features |
| 9 |
> > > > for the 1.11.x branch ... |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > Does this preclude any bug fixes going into 1.11 that affect the |
| 12 |
> > > release? I have at least two that I would love to get resolved before |
| 13 |
> > > 2006.0's release, and waiting for the eventual stabilization of 1.12 |
| 14 |
> > > isn't exactly the best plan for this. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > Got bug numbers? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> 57229 |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
not an issue with baselayout, lvm code has been moved to the lvm ebuild |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> 99682 |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
that bug is still waiting for feedback from you releng peeps :P |
| 25 |
-mike |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives