| 1 |
On Sun, 10 May 2009 10:41:03 +0100 |
| 2 |
David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sunday 10 May 2009 09:58:22 Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:00:17 -0600 |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > You can't test FEATURES in an ebuild. It's portage-specific. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Actually, am I right? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Yes. (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239671#c10 gives a better |
| 13 |
> approach for this particular problem.) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Thanks. It's still kind of icky but better than nothing. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> > There's a crapload of stuff in the tree doing |
| 18 |
> > things like this and worse with FEATURES. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Welcome to Gentoo. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Yes, business as usual. People, if you need to know if "test" is in |
| 23 |
FEATURES, there's a reason it automatically and unconditionally sets USE=test. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
| 28 |
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
| 29 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives