| 1 |
Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> Given the sheer volume of impassioned response, regardless of any |
| 3 |
> technical arguments, I'm dropping the top-level profile idea for now. |
| 4 |
> Several architecture teams have expressed an interest in creating |
| 5 |
> sub-profiles under their own, however, and I'll be working with them to |
| 6 |
> get those implemented. Perhaps I'll revisit the top-level idea at a |
| 7 |
> later date when all the fuss has died down. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Sub-profiles are included in my statement in the other thread. Please |
| 10 |
hold off on adding or modifying *anything* until the Council has decided |
| 11 |
on how we wish to proceed in handling situations like this. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86) |
| 15 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
| 16 |
mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
| 17 |
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/ |
| 18 |
http://www.halcy0n.com |
Archives