1 |
On 24 Apr 2003 12:48:20 -0400 |
2 |
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Many of these bugs have already been fixed. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Reading through bug 18918, Azarah's comments seem perfectly reasonable |
7 |
> to me, so I think the author of that message was a bit harsh. |
8 |
> Lindstrom's last comment on that bug does seem fairly clear, but I'm |
9 |
> wondering if his proposed fix will break /etc/profile for the zsh (and |
10 |
> any other fancy *sh that might exist that I don't know anything |
11 |
> about)? I do agree that we should try to prevent our /etc/profile from |
12 |
> breaking people's prompts, but I don't want people to lose the |
13 |
> distinctive Gentoo eye-candy, either. |
14 |
|
15 |
<snip> |
16 |
|
17 |
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 |
18 |
|
19 |
I hit the issue of bash being a superset of sh myself a couple of months |
20 |
ago when writing scripts to run on SCO, AIX & Linux. |
21 |
|
22 |
I would suggest that the either one has to have separate tests for bash |
23 |
& and other /bin/sh or /etc/profile should stick to a POSIX compliant |
24 |
value and as was suggested /etc/bashrc can set something fancier. |
25 |
|
26 |
If someone can suggest which is the most compliant, least extended sh |
27 |
implementation I would be happy to have that installed on one of my |
28 |
boxes for testing. |
29 |
-- |
30 |
Mark Gordon |
31 |
Paid to be a Geek & a Senior Software Developer |
32 |
Currently looking for a new job commutable from Slough, Berks, U.K. |
33 |
Although my email address says spamtrap, it is real and I read it. |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |