| 1 |
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'd be happy if some other unpacker is used than lzma-utils - one that |
| 3 |
> does not depend on libstdc++ - I'm sure it can be done, heck it's done |
| 4 |
> in integrated form in some other projects in less than a couple |
| 5 |
> kilobytes of code for the unpacking from a VFS. Meanwhile please |
| 6 |
> consider using the upstream provided .tar.gz tarballs instead and not |
| 7 |
> roll patchsets in .lzma just cause you can. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
tar-1.20 has lzma support, so maybe it could handle this too, once it |
| 10 |
goes into stable |
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives