1 |
On 21/03/18 01:27, Kent Fredric wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:48:29 -0400 |
3 |
> Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> There's a real technical problem hidden in there. Since npm |
6 |
>> (recursively!) bundles every dependency, nobody worries about |
7 |
>> compatibility in their JS packages. You'll quickly find yourself stuck. |
8 |
> Honestly, I expected at some point we'd reach for slotting and normalization, |
9 |
> and recursive trees of symlinks.... |
10 |
> |
11 |
> eg: |
12 |
> /usr/lib/nodejs/<packagename>/<version>/lib/<dependency-name> -> /usr/lib/nodejs/<packagename>/<version> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Or something like that. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> So you'd wind up with |
17 |
> |
18 |
> /usr/lib/nodejs/foo/1.0/lib/bar -> /usr/lib/nodejs/bar/1.0 |
19 |
> /usr/lib/nodejs/foo/1.0/lib/baz -> /usr/lib/nodejs/baz/2.0 |
20 |
> /usr/lib/nodejs/bar/1.0/lib/baz -> /usr/lib/nodejs/baz/1.0 |
21 |
> /usr/lib/nodejs/baz/1.0/... |
22 |
> /usr/lib/nodejs/baz/2.0/... |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Or something like that. But I imagine constructing such a thing a |
25 |
> rather painful exercise. |
26 |
> |
27 |
.... Said the voice of bitter experience ... *eg* :] |