From: | Andrew Cowie <andrew@×××××××××××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 -> x86_64 | ||
Date: | Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:16:12 | ||
Message-Id: | 1203571637.4677.1.camel@moonglow.roaming.operationaldynamics.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 -> x86_64 by Ryan Hill |
1 | On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 19:42 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: |
2 | > But I agree, rekeywording amd64 to x86_64 would probably be more work than it's |
3 | > worth. |
4 | |
5 | Can we not just hardwire an alias into the emerge codebase? |
6 | |
7 | I must admit, from a purely optical standpoint, the idea of saying my |
8 | system is "amd64" when it is nothing of the sort really grates. If, |
9 | internally, it just translated "x86_64" to "amd64" wouldn't that be ok? |
10 | |
11 | AfC |
12 | Sydney |
13 | |
14 | |
15 | -- |
16 | gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 -> x86_64 | "Olivier Crête" <tester@g.o> |