| 1 |
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 06:18:26PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 |
> Sure I did... Could you tell me why should we accumulate broken and |
| 3 |
> vulnerable junk in the tree for years? (Outdated ebuild A depends on |
| 4 |
> junky outdated ebuild B which depends on crappy, unsupported ebuilds C, |
| 5 |
> D and E which... ) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Thats not the maintainer's problem but the Arch Team's problem so they |
| 8 |
are the ones that decide what to do. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Either keyword it in a reasonable time or you'll lose the keyword, damn |
| 11 |
> simple... Can't do it in X months? Sorry, too bad for your arch, the |
| 12 |
> package is gone and users will rant (or they won't, and then you don't |
| 13 |
> need the keywords in the first place). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
No. Arch Teams manage their keywords the way _they_ want not the way YOU |
| 16 |
or others that don't work on arch teams want. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It is actually *that* simple. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- ferdy |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Fernando J. Pereda GarcimartÃn |
| 24 |
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git) |
| 25 |
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 |
Archives