Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:29:53
Message-Id: 20040624041519.GD18367@mustard.flatmonk.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem by Donnie Berkholz
1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: [Wed Jun 23 2004, 05:13:36PM EDT]
2 > Here's how I see it. PMs are responsible for the whole package, including
3 > arch-independent and arch-dependent aspects. Independently, PMs work to
4 > ensure the arch-independent parts are stable. Together with AMs, the PMs
5 > work to ensure the arch-dependent aspects are stable.
6 >
7 > Until the day when AMs have equal amounts of time to spend on each package
8 > as PMs, I don't see this changing.
9
10 Well said, Donnie.
11
12 Regards,
13 Aron
14
15 --
16 Aron Griffis
17 Gentoo Linux Developer