1 |
On Friday 05 August 2005 12:34, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday 29 July 2005 15:56, Dan Armak wrote: |
3 |
> > base.eclass (which inherited by many other eclasses) has an src_unpack |
4 |
> > supporting patching from patchfiles listed in $PATCHES. However, today, |
5 |
> > if patching fails the process doesn't abort. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> About this, there are still problems about committing a change on |
8 |
> base.eclass to use epatch instead of patch? (so that it also takes care of |
9 |
> recognize the right strip option) |
10 |
I don't think there are any problems. |
11 |
|
12 |
I've been using a modified base.eclass that died if patching failed for the |
13 |
last few weeks, so I know the packages I have installed don't have failing |
14 |
patches. Since this thread started I've modified it to use epatch and so far |
15 |
that's worked OK. |
16 |
|
17 |
So I think we can commit this (with epatch, that is). Can I consider the |
18 |
thread so far a consensus to let me do it? |
19 |
|
20 |
BTW, I've managed to lost all my mail from Thursday, so if there was something |
21 |
relevant in this thread could someone please forward it to me. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Dan Armak |
25 |
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) |
26 |
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key |
27 |
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 |