Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
To: Alastair Tse <liquidx@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-core@g.o, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] A proposal about proposals
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:17:14
Message-Id: 1056989833.25111.12.camel@orange-pc.ces.clemson.edu
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] A proposal about proposals by Alastair Tse
1 On Sun, 2003-06-29 at 16:32, Alastair Tse wrote:
2 > On Sun, 2003-06-29 at 19:41, Grant Goodyear wrote:
3 > > Fair enough. Also, I think we should do away w/ the unnecessary
4 > > distinction between Informational and Standards-Track GLEPS.
5 >
6 > I think it would be more appropriate to rename Standards-Track to
7 > something more descriptive rather than doing away with it (you suggested
8 > that in GLEP1). Maybe "Action" or "Enhancement"?
9
10 Well, the current distinction would then be between "Informational" and
11 "Action" ("Enhancement" seems redundant, since it's part of the name.)
12 The reason I raised the question is that I wasn't sure I could
13 definitively discern the difference between the two. For example, would
14 drobbins' recent proposal count as I or A?
15
16 > No problems. I'd like to volunteer myself to get this off the ground
17 > (<-- formal) :)
18
19 Thank you very much!
20
21 > Just in case people have forgotten, the URL is:
22 > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/
23 --
24 Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature