1 |
Thanks Petteri, |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> 1) Status quo |
5 |
> - does not allow changing inherit |
6 |
> - bash version in global scope |
7 |
> - global scope in general is quite locked down |
8 |
|
9 |
lets move on! |
10 |
|
11 |
> |
12 |
> 2) EAPI in file extension |
13 |
> - Allows changing global scope and the internal format of the ebuild |
14 |
> a) .ebuild-<eapi> |
15 |
> - ignored by current Portage |
16 |
> b) .<eapi>.ebuild |
17 |
> - current Portage does not work with this |
18 |
> c) .<eapi>.<new extension> |
19 |
> - ignored by current Portage |
20 |
|
21 |
2 a) and 2 c) are fine by me. |
22 |
|
23 |
> |
24 |
> 3) EAPI in locked down place in the ebuild |
25 |
> - Allows changing global scope |
26 |
> - EAPI can't be changed in an existing ebuild so the PM can trust |
27 |
> the value in the cache |
28 |
> - Does not allow changing versioning rules unless version becomes a |
29 |
> normal metadata variable |
30 |
> * Needs more accesses to cache as now you don't have to load older |
31 |
> versions if the latest is not masked |
32 |
> a) <new extension> |
33 |
> b) new subdirectory like ebuilds/ |
34 |
> - we could drop extension all together so don't have to argue about |
35 |
> it any more |
36 |
> - more directory reads to get the list of ebuilds in a repository |
37 |
> c) .ebuild in current directory |
38 |
> - needs one year wait |
39 |
|
40 |
no thanks. |
41 |
|
42 |
> |
43 |
> Regards, |
44 |
> Petteri |
45 |
|
46 |
regards |
47 |
Thilo |