| 1 |
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 20:55 +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 16:25:13 CEST Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
> > This may effect your plans to enable ninja by default, since it will |
| 4 |
> > break any fortran package. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Not much concerned about that; backend default can be overridden by package, |
| 7 |
> should its maintainer find out it breaks by EAPI-7 bump. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
...and soon enough we end up tracking packages whose default backend |
| 11 |
needed to be changed because the maintainer had to workaround bugs |
| 12 |
in a particular ninja version. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Am I the only one who misses the times when programmers made working |
| 15 |
software and tried to fix bugs rather than releasing whatever satisfies |
| 16 |
some internal use case, and ignoring bugs that didn't affect it? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Best regards, |
| 20 |
Michał Górny |
Archives