| 1 |
On Sun, 2006-01-01 at 01:12 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:54:21 -0500 Chris Gianelloni |
| 3 |
> <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 13:40 -0500, Peter wrote: |
| 5 |
> | > This is because glx has kernel as a dependency. Can't have it both |
| 6 |
> | > ways (as someone else here pointed out) because you'd have a |
| 7 |
> | > circular dependency...kernel requires glx, but glx requires kernel |
| 8 |
> | > which requires glx...and around we go. |
| 9 |
> | |
| 10 |
> | Why can't both RDEPEND on the other? This works perfectly fine for |
| 11 |
> | many packages in the tree. A circular dependency isn't a bad thing if |
| 12 |
> | they're both in RDEPEND, it is when they're both in DEPEND that causes |
| 13 |
> | an issue. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> It only works right now because of a coincidence in how Portage's dep |
| 16 |
> resolver (doesn't) work. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
Isn't this what PDEPEND is for? |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Tres Melton |
| 21 |
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat |
Archives