1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 02 Apr 2020, Alessandro Barbieri wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I have concerns about the inclusion of zoom in ::gentoo. For me it's |
4 |
> more like a malware. |
5 |
|
6 |
Gentoo is about choice. If users want to use Zoom (or have to, because |
7 |
their employer schedules a meeting using that platform) then it is not |
8 |
our call to stop them. |
9 |
|
10 |
> From the hacker news feed you'll find out that: |
11 |
|
12 |
> [1] zero day vulnerability found |
13 |
> [2] passwords are truncated to 32 bit |
14 |
> [3] previously sent data to facebook |
15 |
> [4] end to end traffic isn't encrypted |
16 |
> [5] signed binary run unsigned script |
17 |
|
18 |
> 1 https://techcrunch.com/2020/04/01/zoom-doom/?guccounter=1 |
19 |
> 2 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22749706 |
20 |
> 3 https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/z3b745/zoom-removes-code-that-sends-data-to-facebook |
21 |
> 4 https://theintercept.com/2020/03/31/zoom-meeting-encryption/ |
22 |
> 5 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22746764 |
23 |
|
24 |
Right, and I (as its Gentoo maintainer) won't recommend Zoom to anyone, |
25 |
nor use it myself unless I am forced to. |
26 |
|
27 |
However, if we would remove the package from the Gentoo repo, users |
28 |
would inevitably install it from one of the overlays listed at |
29 |
https://gpo.zugaina.org/net-im/zoom-bin (there are even more, named |
30 |
net-im/zoom or app-office/zoom), which vary in quality. Most of them |
31 |
install bundled libraries which are old and vulnerable, e.g. Qt 5.9.6. |
32 |
|
33 |
I believe that the number of overlays (more than a dozen) containing the |
34 |
package shows that there is demand for it. In the main tree we have at |
35 |
least a chance to address bug reports. |
36 |
|
37 |
Ulrich |