From: | Nathan Myers <ncm@×××××××.org> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] low-latency vs. pre-emptible |
Date: | Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:50:41 |
Message-Id: | 20020125003753.GA4432@cantrip.org |
1 | I notice Gentoo is using RML's pre-emptible kernel instead of |
2 | Andrew Morton's low-latency kernel, despite both Linus's and |
3 | Alan's recommendation of the latter. Maybe it would be worth |
4 | posting a position paper (or comment) about why. If not, I'm |
5 | curious, anyway. (ISTM that the low-latency patch should be much |
6 | less hazardous, and ought to be substantially more efficient on |
7 | single-CPU systems anyway.) |
8 | |
9 | Nathan Myers |
10 | ncm@×××××××.org |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] low-latency vs. pre-emptible | Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |