Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nathan Myers <ncm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] low-latency vs. pre-emptible
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:50:41
1 I notice Gentoo is using RML's pre-emptible kernel instead of
2 Andrew Morton's low-latency kernel, despite both Linus's and
3 Alan's recommendation of the latter. Maybe it would be worth
4 posting a position paper (or comment) about why. If not, I'm
5 curious, anyway. (ISTM that the low-latency patch should be much
6 less hazardous, and ought to be substantially more efficient on
7 single-CPU systems anyway.)
9 Nathan Myers
10 ncm@×××××××.org


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] low-latency vs. pre-emptible Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>