| 1 |
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Alastair Tse wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 6 |
> > Hash: SHA1 |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > On 7 Feb 2004, at 11:57, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 10 |
> > > If so, perhaps the 'python-updater' message in the python upgrade |
| 11 |
> > > should be stronger, because you are saying that the one-and-only |
| 12 |
> > > guaranteed order of things for this particular operation is: |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > You mean being in gentoo-announce and on #gentoo's topic is not strong |
| 16 |
> > enough? A clarification of the problem here is not that you are running |
| 17 |
> > python-2.3, but because your python version was older than |
| 18 |
> > python-2.2.3-r5 and hence did not have the patches that prevented it |
| 19 |
> > from trying to make .pyc's inside sandbox. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
I see that in my original note, I wrote "upgrade to python-2.2.3" instead |
| 23 |
of "python-2.3.3." I sometimes make that kind of transposition; sorry for |
| 24 |
the confusion...) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> Well, no, I was running python-2.2.3-r5, upgraded to -2.3, thus says |
| 27 |
> genlop: |
| 28 |
> =========== |
| 29 |
> Merged at Sun Jan 4 03:06:03 2004 (python-2.2.3-r5) |
| 30 |
> Merged at Sat Feb 7 00:11:17 2004 (python-2.3.3) |
| 31 |
> ============ |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <mccormickf@××××××.org> |
| 36 |
Host: terciopelo (U2-SMP GenToo Linux) |
| 37 |
Fax: (703) 392-0401 |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives