Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour | ||
| Date: | Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:48:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20924.28812.579338.46479@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour by "Diego Elio Pettenò" |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >> "restrict+http:" (as suggested by the OP) is probably not enough |
| 4 | >> because it doesn't distinguish between fetch and mirror |
| 5 | >> restriction. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | > nofetch+http and nomirror+http ? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Or the other way around: {fetch,mirror}+http. I'd rather have RESTRICT |
| 10 | apply to all of SRC_URI (as it is now) and use the new syntax to |
| 11 | specify any exceptions from the restriction. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour | Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> |