Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 10:44:03
Message-Id: 20160207104348.GH28175@ultrachro.me
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy by "M.B."
1 Sunday 07 Feb 2016 11:38:27, M.B. wrote :
2 >
3 > Hello folks.
4 >
5 > While hacking away on a new ebuild I came across the issue that
6 > games.eclass apparently got banned from future use. The only references
7 > I was able to dig up (apart from helpful people on IRC), were
8 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566498 (games.eclass: use of
9 > games group needs to be removed wrt 20151011 Council meeting)
10 > and
11 > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Meeting_Summaries#Games_team_policies_issue
12 > (A mere deprecation notice).
13 >
14 > In contrast, a simple "grep deprec /usr/portage/eclass/" gives numerous
15 > deprecation warnings; just games.eclass is not among them.
16 >
17 > Please provide some guidance how (community-)developers are supposed to
18 > handle games (in particular wrt games.eclass) in the future. This also
19 > includes usage of /usr/games/{bin/lib/share} etc.
20 >
21 > Regards,
22 > tomboy64
23 >
24 >
25
26 Good point.
27
28 I too came across this problem when dealing with another bug
29 (games-emulation/ppsspp). A user filed a bug, complaining the ebuild wasn't
30 installing the compiled binary in /usr/games and suggested it should inherit
31 the games eclass: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572606#c12
32
33 I wasn't aware of the ban too so if someone has a better solution, I'm all
34 ears.
35
36 Regards,
37
38 --
39 Patrice Clement
40 Gentoo Linux developer
41 http://www.gentoo.org