Re: [gentoo-dev] Problem with Zangband ebuild

[Spider]

if you use an ebuild, /etc/make.conf gets sourced automatically :)

and, you dont need to use CXXFLAGS unless Zangband uses c++ code. only
use CFLAGS in normal C code and all should be ok.

//Spider


begin  quote
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 11:59:28 +0200
Malte Obbel Forsberg <door@×××××××××××.nu> wrote:

> Oh .. I've got it all wrong then! :-P
> Anywhoo, if I do a "source /etc/make.conf", patch the makefile so that
> it will have a line like: gcc $(CFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS)
> $(BLAH_OLD_SETTINGS) it'll compile with the flags configured in
> make.conf?
>
> Thanks,
> Malte
>
> > Actually,
> > the "CHOST" flag is -not- for optimization.
> > that is the purpouse of "CFLAGS" and "CXXFLAGS" to do.
> >
> > The CHOST flags is only there in order to let the
> > makefiles/configure identify the system "properly" especially for
> > cross-platform building.
> >
> > in the case of wanting something optimized you can safely discard
> > CHOST and only use CFLAGS / CXXFLAGS.
> >
> >
> > and, what I meant is that /etc/make.conf is bash compatible, meaning
> > that if you just "source /etc/make.conf" it will sett
> > CHOST,CFLAGS,CXXFLAGS and other such things to the system default.
> > usable if you are in /var/tmp/portage/package/work/package/... and
> > debugging just what goes wrong somewhere ;)  (configure flags and
> > incompabilities spring to mind)
> >
> > //Spider
> >
> > --
> > begin  happy99.exe
> > This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
> > See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
> > end
> >
>
>
> --
> Malte Obbel Forsberg
> door@×××××××××××.nu
> JabberId: doordoc@××××××.at
> UIN: 12035285
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@g.o
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev


--
begin  happy99.exe
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end