| 1 |
begin quote |
| 2 |
On 25 May 2002 11:18:55 +0200 |
| 3 |
suka_at <suka_at@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 03:55, Spider wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > In following of the Sun and Gnome predictate, the default installed |
| 8 |
> > WindowManager is "Metacity". Sawfish is also avaiable as a snapshot, |
| 9 |
> > or with your old version. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Just wanted to point out, that according to the Gnome 2 release team |
| 13 |
> meeting this is not true anymore: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
yes, I know that fairly well, I also know that there were some bad |
| 16 |
inconsistencies with rep-gtk and gnome enabled gtk+, and that the last |
| 17 |
sawfish snapshot released was completely unbuildable, thats why I set |
| 18 |
Metacity as the default windowmanager when you installed "gnome" as-is. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Hope this clarifies my decision to make MEtacity the default |
| 21 |
windowmanager in gnome(2) for the moment, when the final is released and |
| 22 |
there is a working Sawfish (which I quite doubt. sawfish won't be in |
| 23 |
time) That will change. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
//Spider |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
begin .signature |
| 30 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 31 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 32 |
end |
Archives