Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | trustees@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] CI services for Gentoo & Social Contract meanings of "dependant" notifications on depgraph breakages | ||
| Date: | Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:59:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20150415115921.13352.qmail@stuge.se | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] CI services for Gentoo & Social Contract meanings of "dependant" notifications on depgraph breakages by "Robin H. Johnson" |
||
| 1 | Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 2 | > Why should we not be able to benefit from really good closed-source |
| 3 | > CI tools that are offered for free to the open-source community? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Because it may not be in line with Gentoo politics. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | > Jenkins, Buildbot and others are existing libre options in this |
| 9 | > ecosystem, but aren't keeping pace with development. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Politics that somehow matter usually require compromise. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | The (rhetorical) question is, what is most important? |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | //Peter |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] CI services for Gentoo & Social Contract meanings of "dependant" notifications on depgraph breakages | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |