1 |
Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
> On 01/25/2010 04:28 AM, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Well put. I would agree that a simple warning should be given before |
5 |
>> removing a system package or a package that system must have, especially |
6 |
>> portage. |
7 |
>> Maybe what portage needs is a reverse -n feature. Instead of adding |
8 |
>> something to the world file, it removes a unwanted package from the |
9 |
>> world file and then the user could use --depclean to remove that package |
10 |
>> and its no longer needed friends. I assume this is doable. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> You can already use --depclean for this. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Regards, |
17 |
> Petteri |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
So there is already a option that is the reverse of -n ? |
22 |
|
23 |
Dale |
24 |
|
25 |
:-) :-) |