| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On July 19, 2002 10:10 am, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Friday 19 July 2002 16:04, you wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Why would those cause a problem? Are you telling me that if I use |
| 7 |
> > different CFLAGS/USE combination for a lib than for the executable those |
| 8 |
> > two won't work together? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I think that as long as the same version is present, they will work. |
| 11 |
> > That's the magic of a shared library. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> That is right, but versions do matter (sadly), and also some ebuilds will |
| 14 |
> use libraries (if installed) that are not in the use flags. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That's fine, the ebuild dependency stuff will handle that the same way as |
| 17 |
today, the only difference would be that instead of doing the extract/compile |
| 18 |
it could check a distribution system to see if the package is not already |
| 19 |
available. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
- -- |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Yannick Koehler |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) |
| 27 |
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
iD8DBQE9OB8EfuKOJNEyL1URAqDPAJ9EYc+Ny384DKxiiO9og4hPZqFIwgCfTzoW |
| 30 |
JK8FCwrqmAKfN5Fol9Vou+o= |
| 31 |
=NnfS |
| 32 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives