| 1 |
Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I am currently bootstrapping on another system. I added "nptl" to the |
| 4 |
> USE flags. I started scripts/bootstrap-2.6.sh. It gave me an error about |
| 5 |
> sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.0 being masked so I edited the build and |
| 6 |
> added x86 to KEYWORDS and ran scripts/bootstrap-2.6.sh again. Will this |
| 7 |
> leave me with a from-scratch NPTL-enabled system? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You might want to run this patch on your linux-headers before you try to |
| 11 |
build XFree86. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
--- kd.h.orig 2004-02-03 10:51:27.818963120 -0600 |
| 14 |
+++ kd.h 2004-02-03 10:51:36.501643152 -0600 |
| 15 |
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
struct kbd_repeat { |
| 18 |
int delay; /* in msec; <= 0: don't change */ |
| 19 |
- int period; /* in msec; <= 0: don't change */ |
| 20 |
+ int rate; /* in msec; <= 0: don't change */ |
| 21 |
/* earlier this field was misnamed "rate" */ |
| 22 |
}; |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Of course, you may want to change it back again after you emerge XFree86. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
--- kd.h 2004-02-03 10:51:36.501643152 -0600 |
| 27 |
+++ kd.h.orig 2004-02-03 10:51:27.818963120 -0600 |
| 28 |
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
struct kbd_repeat { |
| 31 |
int delay; /* in msec; <= 0: don't change */ |
| 32 |
- int rate; /* in msec; <= 0: don't change */ |
| 33 |
+ int period; /* in msec; <= 0: don't change */ |
| 34 |
/* earlier this field was misnamed "rate" */ |
| 35 |
}; |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
I think a kernel specific conditional patch should be included in |
| 39 |
XFree86 as it is unlikely the linux kernel headers are going to change back. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Tom Veldhouse |
Archives