| 1 |
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 05:01 am, Karsten Schulz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2003 07:09 schrieb Zack Gilburd: |
| 3 |
> > AFAIK, lsh is not secure, whatsoever. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> why? Do you have some information about exploits or exploitable bugs? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> As far as I know, there are no serious problems known at the moment. The |
| 8 |
> only disadvantage with lsh is, that there are not so much people who |
| 9 |
> use it. But that will change, when Gentoo distribute lsh ;-) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Karsten |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
For a while, the README for lsh contained: |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
This directory contains snapshots of lsh development. lsh is a free |
| 16 |
implementation of the ssh protocol. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
lsh is far from finished; don't expect these snapshots to compile or |
| 19 |
work, and even if they appear to work, beware that lsh currently does |
| 20 |
*NOT* provide any security at all. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Until yesterday when it was updated from 1998. I was relying on the old |
| 23 |
README. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Nevermind, please proceed. |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Zack Gilburd |
| 28 |
http://tehunlose.com |
| 29 |
GnuPG Key ID: A79A45668240AB6C |
Archives