1 |
Hello. |
2 |
|
3 |
On Пнд, 2005-09-19 at 20:24 +0900, Chris White wrote: |
4 |
> I think the problem here isn't about choice, but support. Mainly deprication |
5 |
> is the issue here. GTK2 was meant to be an upgrade of GTK1 interfaces. At |
6 |
> some point upstream is going to have to giveup and say "Sorry sam, use gtk2 |
7 |
> or we can't support you" (Who knows, maybe that's already happened). |
8 |
|
9 |
This already happened. |
10 |
|
11 |
I was forced to move from gtk+-1 when one day after xorg update all |
12 |
russian letters in program's interface became unreadable. I've searched |
13 |
mailing lists, forums but no solution there. Then I posted bug upstream |
14 |
[1]. The answer was that gtk+-1 is unsupported... |
15 |
|
16 |
Thus. The idea to keep linux small is very attractive, but gtk+-1 |
17 |
library is not the variant until somebody continues to support it. |
18 |
|
19 |
Links: |
20 |
[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169178 |
21 |
|
22 |
Peter. |