| 1 |
On 01/16/2014 05:27 PM, Sergey Popov wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Thanks, for the proposal. IIRC, there was similar backroom agreement in |
| 4 |
> some minor arches, look at how armin76 stabilized packages earlier - |
| 5 |
> sometimes he drops vast amount of keywords on ia64/sparc/m68k to |
| 6 |
> unstable in stabilization requests. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> And i think we should continue this practice. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
I agree completely. The keywords on many packages are historical and do |
| 11 |
not necessarily represent the current reality. Is it really a good use |
| 12 |
of our resources to maintain stable keywords for some small auxiliary |
| 13 |
package? |
| 14 |
I think every stable request is a good opportunity for each minor arch |
| 15 |
team to review their keywords for that package. |
Archives