| 1 |
El mar, 11-06-2013 a las 11:55 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 2 |
> Hello |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Because of: |
| 5 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432848 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> We discovered an old bug affecting intltool that causes prefix of |
| 8 |
> localedir to be always hardcoded to the same location instead of |
| 9 |
> respecting configure flags. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The patch is fixed by intltool upstream in their master branch but still |
| 12 |
> no new version was released including it. Anyway, we now have |
| 13 |
> dev-util/intltool-0.50.2-r1 with the bug fixed. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> The problem of this issue (and most involving intltool) is that we need |
| 16 |
> to run: |
| 17 |
> intltoolize --copy --automake --force |
| 18 |
> (it doesn't seem to trigger maintainer mode in all ebuilds I have tried, |
| 19 |
> then, doesn't look to require eautoreconf to be run) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> for all packages to get new and fixed ${S}/po/Makefile.in.in copied to |
| 22 |
> the sources, otherwise bundled file is used and, then, the one unfixed. |
| 23 |
> As it's unreliable to ping all upstreams involving intltool (they are a |
| 24 |
> ton) and this kind of problem will likely re-appear again in the future |
| 25 |
> (since the Makefile.in.in will be fixed in intltool upstream tarball but |
| 26 |
> will take a lot of time to reach all affected packages) we were |
| 27 |
> considering to run above command always at eclass level -> that way we |
| 28 |
> would stop using bundled ${S}/po/Makefile.in.in and, then, we would |
| 29 |
> always use the one provided by our intltool package (that should get |
| 30 |
> fixed and updated more often). |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Other possible solution would be to use ELT-PATCHES to achieve that, but |
| 33 |
> I am still unsure about how would it work. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> What are your thoughts? |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
None? :| |
Archives