| 1 |
Pardon me if you receive this message two times, I'm not sure it went to the |
| 2 |
ml the first time: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:49:12PM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 14:08 -0300, Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Good luck for the remaining proctors, they will need as they aparently |
| 7 |
can't |
| 8 |
> > even expect any support from council members. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> There's a *BIG* difference between support and blind support. Nobody |
| 11 |
> ever promised the proctors blind support. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
And the proctors never asked for blind support. If you didn´t like |
| 14 |
something the proctors did, you should have contacted them first before |
| 15 |
unauthorizing them in a public mailing list, asking why they did so. The |
| 16 |
way you did it, it was like you wanted the proctors to fail. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
As for the guidelines, as far as I remember you were invited to discuss |
| 19 |
them with the proctors and in some point you chose to leave the process. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Pilla |
Archives