| 1 |
On Monday 17 July 2006 11:14, Aron Griffis wrote: |
| 2 |
> Vapier wrote: [Thu Jul 13 2006, 11:32:39PM EDT] |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > On Wednesday 12 July 2006 13:37, Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > SpanKY complained that he cannot set a custom die message then. But |
| 6 |
> > > this is not needed here, since every do* command can be clearly |
| 7 |
> > > identified by the argument and the directory it will be installed to. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > except for the times where the do funcs can install the same file in |
| 10 |
> > different code paths |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Maybe fixup die() to include the call stack w/ function line numbers? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I can't tell from your reply whether you dislike do* dying |
| 15 |
> automatically, or if you just don't like some implementation details. |
| 16 |
> Which is it? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
at this point i'm against it due to the loss of information/granularity in the |
| 19 |
die message ... and utilizing DIE_MSG is garbage |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
if die can be made more useful, then i'd be for the do* functions calling die |
| 22 |
for me |
| 23 |
-mike |
Archives