Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:18:41
Message-Id: 1535159907.743.0.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test by Francesco Riosa
1 On Sat, 2018-08-25 at 01:14 +0200, Francesco Riosa wrote:
2 > Il 24/08/18 19:08, Mike Gilbert ha scritto:
3 > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:45 AM Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> wrote:
4 > > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:27:01 -0400
5 > > > Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote:
6 > > >
7 > > > > If you want to define behavior that can be relied upon in ebuilds, it
8 > > > > should be specified in PMS. PMS does not define any meaning for the
9 > > > > "test" USE flag.
10 > > >
11 > > > We should eschew idealism about how the world *should* behave, and avoid
12 > > > making portage a steaming garbage heap in order to comply with a
13 > > > terrible PMS specification of a heavily used feature.
14 > >
15 > > Portage still works just fine for most people who would enable
16 > > FEATURES=test. Stop exaggerating.
17 > >
18 >
19 > People enabling FEATURES=test on most but not all packages had some
20 > troubles and they need to disable them in both package.{env,use}
21 > I'd like to have a flag to reinstate the previous portage behaviour, but
22 > that's probably too late
23 >
24
25 That was a bug in Portage and AFAIK it has been fixed. It would be nice
26 if people didn't add extra hacks to workaround bugs that no longer
27 exist.
28
29 --
30 Best regards,
31 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature