Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] moving gcc-5.2 to unstable
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 13:49:56
Message-Id: 20151001134947.GM5374@vapier.lan
1 what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ?
2
3 the general list looks pretty good:
4 https://bugs.gentoo.org/536984
5
6 the only glaring issue is the C++11 ABI breakage:
7 https://bugs.gentoo.org/542482
8
9 we already posted a news item when the breakage started in gcc-4.7:
10 https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/4fa0c84858b4df49668da20302fc5b6f
11
12 but since gcc-5.x makes this the new default standard, more people are going to
13 run into it, so we probably want a reminder. do we want any sort of automation
14 otherwise here ?
15 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] moving gcc-5.2 to unstable Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] moving gcc-5.2 to unstable Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] moving gcc-5.2 to unstable "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: moving gcc-5.2 to unstable Ryan Hill <rhill@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] gcc-5 news item wrt C++ ABI Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] moving gcc-5.2 to unstable Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] moving gcc-5.3 to unstable Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>